Clemson University has admitted some of its students to its admission requirements.
The university confirmed that at least one student had been admitted to the university.
The decision to admit students is based on a review of the criteria set out by the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC), which includes a “significant number” of the “most vulnerable”, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
“The Australian Human Sentencing Council (AHSC) has determined that, because the student’s primary purpose in applying for admission was to study at Clemson, the university is in compliance with the law,” the university said in a statement.
“This student is a recent arrival to Clemson University and is currently enrolled in an academic course at Clemson University.
The university has confirmed to the AHSC that the student will be provided with an academic transcript of the course and will be required to meet certain requirements before being admitted to any university.”
In 2016, the Australian Government said the ACCC had “found serious failings” in how colleges were enforcing their admissions laws.
Clemson University and the Australian Federal Police said the two universities had met “the legal requirements”.
Clemson has more than 1,200 students enrolled at the university, but the university only has a maximum of 10 students per campus.
The ACCC’s submission to the University of Queensland said there were “serious concerns” that students would be “re-arrested for non-compliance” and could be “discharged” if they did not comply with the university’s admission requirements and policies.
“While the University’s admission processes are subject to the Australian Constitution, the University also takes great care to ensure the integrity of its processes is maintained and that those who fail to meet the legal requirements are treated fairly,” the submission said.
The submission said the Australian government had also recommended that the ACCCP and universities “work together to ensure that all students have access to an equal and appropriate level of support to help them achieve their goals and that the rights of students are respected and protected”.”
This is a significant number of students who are vulnerable to being re-arraigned for noncompliance, who are subjecting themselves to a range of risk-based sanctions, including imprisonment, financial sanctions and the removal of their degree and/or course credits.”
The submission said the Australian government had also recommended that the ACCCP and universities “work together to ensure that all students have access to an equal and appropriate level of support to help them achieve their goals and that the rights of students are respected and protected”.
Clemantle University, which was formerly the University Of Sydney, has the highest admission rates in Australia.
It had an admission rate of more than 90 per cent in the 2015-16 academic year.
The university was previously criticised by the Human Rights Law Centre of Australia for “stifling the voices of students and families who have been harmed by the university system”.
In 2015, the federal government announced the ACCCA would investigate whether the ACCCC was doing enough to stop universities from abusing their admissions policies.
Under the recommendations of the ACCCEA, the Federal Government announced that the Federal Court would have jurisdiction over universities accused of “systematic, institutionalised and/ or institutionalised discrimination, abuse or neglect”.
Topics:disabilities,human-rights,education,law-crime-and-justice,education-and.courts-and–justice,disability,education—other,academia-and–college-andamp;academy-and—university-and-$,uq,australiaContact Michelle O’NeillMore stories from New South Wales
